Navigation

Archive | Recent cases

August 30, 2013

NYLJ Article, “The Court’s Duty in a Condemnation Case”

Partners Michael Rikon & Jonathan Houghton recently authored an article in the New York Law Journal titled “The Court’s Duty in a Condemnation Case.” The article discusses a recent decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirming an order of the Kings County Supreme Court Justice Wayne Saitta which granted a motion for leave to exchange amended appraisal reports and vacate the Note of Issue filed by the condemnor. The motion followed the review of both sides’ appraisals prior to trial. The trial court reviewed the appraisals that the parties intended to… read more

By
Posted in Condemnation Procedures, Eminent Domain, Highest and Best Use, New York, Published Articles, Recent cases, Trial Preparation
Read more > 1

August 15, 2013

The court has the constitutional mandate to determine just compensation

The Appellate Division, Second Department in Matter of Staten Is. Bluebelt Phase 2 v City of New York, 2013 NY Slip Op 5532, recently affirmed a trial court order (Saitta, J), which granted a motion to exchange amended appraisal reports because the appraisal reports that were filed “appeared to be deficient.” The appellate court cited Yaphank Dev. Co. v County of Suffolk, 203 AD2d 280, 282 and explained that the court has a constitutional mandate to give just and fair compensation for any property taken. It explained that the order… read more

By
Posted in Eminent Domain, Offer & Compensation, Recent cases
Read more > 0

July 18, 2013

Why Lawyers Should Do The Work of Lawyers, and Appraisers Should Do the Work of Appraisers

By: Joshua Rikon and Jamie Sinclair. The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) are the generally accepted standards for professional appraisal practice in North America. USPAP contains standards for all types of appraisal services. The standards specifically require that an appraiser perform assignments with impartiality, objectivity, and independence, and without accommodation of personal interests. An appraiser must not perform an assignment with bias; must not advocate the cause or interest of any party or issue;” USPAP 2012-2013 Edition Ethics Rule, p. U-7. The Hon. Wayne P. Saitta recently issued a decision in… read more

By
Posted in New York, Recent cases, Trial Preparation
Read more > 0

May 16, 2013

Willets Point Held Entitled to Reimbursement of Legal and Expert Fees

By: Michael Rikon and Jamie Sinclair As a result of a decision by the Honorable Jaime A. Rios of Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 25, 2013, Willets Point was awarded the reimbursement of attorneys fees and expenses against the City. The EDPL authorizes, in the event that a procedure to acquire property is abandoned (or a court determines the condemnor was not legally authorized to acquire the property), the reimbursement for a condemnee’s actual and necessary costs, disbursements, and expenses (including attorney fees, appraisal fees, engineering fees, and other… read more

By
Posted in Challenging condemnation, Condemnation Procedures, Eminent Domain, New York, Recent cases
Read more > 0

May 2, 2013

Basics of Property Valuation in Condemnation Proceedings

The rule that real property is valued at its highest and best use free and clear of leases, mortgages or other encumbrances regardless of actual use is so fundamental that almost every eminent domain decision begins with a recitation of it. Firstly, the act of condemnation extinguishes any interest on the property. In 1931, the Court of Appeals wrote,  In Matter of City of New York (Allen Street), “the City pays for what it takes and nothing else.  By such taking it extinguishes all existing rights and interests in the property taken.” … read more

By
Posted in Condemnation Procedures, Eminent Domain, Highest and Best Use, Leases, New York, Offer & Compensation, Recent cases, Zoning
Read more > 0